[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200817143836.915920303@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:16:47 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+a730016dc0bdce4f6ff5@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 5.7 357/393] io_uring: fail poll arm on queue proc failure
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
commit a36da65c46565d2527eec3efdb546251e38253fd upstream.
Check the ipt.error value, it must have been either cleared to zero or
set to another error than the default -EINVAL if we don't go through the
waitqueue proc addition. Just give up on poll at that point and return
failure, this will fallback to async work.
io_poll_add() doesn't suffer from this failure case, as it returns the
error value directly.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.7+
Reported-by: syzbot+a730016dc0bdce4f6ff5@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -4544,7 +4544,7 @@ static bool io_arm_poll_handler(struct i
ret = __io_arm_poll_handler(req, &apoll->poll, &ipt, mask,
io_async_wake);
- if (ret) {
+ if (ret || ipt.error) {
io_poll_remove_double(req, apoll->double_poll);
spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
memcpy(&req->work, &apoll->work, sizeof(req->work));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists