linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] RAS/CEC: Fix cec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200817185436.GO549@zn.tnic>
Date:   Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:54:36 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Cc:     Luca Stefani <luca.stefani.ge1@...il.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RAS/CEC: Fix cec_init prototype

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:11:02AM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> Not the toolchain, the tree has patches for LTO+CFI, which tends to
> break with type mismatches. This doesn't affect just building the
> kernel with Clang without other changes.

Ok, that explains it.

As for why I'm still chasing down the exact reason for the reported
breakage: this will determine the urgency with which this fix is handled
and to which trees it needs to go so please be more precise next time
when saying "it broke". :)

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette