[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200817143829.664825610@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:14:17 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@...il.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.7 207/393] ima: Have the LSM free its audit rule
From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>
[ Upstream commit 9ff8a616dfab96a4fa0ddd36190907dc68886d9b ]
Ask the LSM to free its audit rule rather than directly calling kfree().
Both AppArmor and SELinux do additional work in their audit_rule_free()
hooks. Fix memory leaks by allowing the LSMs to perform necessary work.
Fixes: b16942455193 ("ima: use the lsm policy update notifier")
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@...il.com>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 5 +++++
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index 495e28bd488e6..04c246b2b767f 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -400,6 +400,7 @@ static inline void ima_free_modsig(struct modsig *modsig)
#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES
#define security_filter_rule_init security_audit_rule_init
+#define security_filter_rule_free security_audit_rule_free
#define security_filter_rule_match security_audit_rule_match
#else
@@ -410,6 +411,10 @@ static inline int security_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr,
return -EINVAL;
}
+static inline void security_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule)
+{
+}
+
static inline int security_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
void *lsmrule)
{
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index e493063a3c344..236a731492d1e 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static void ima_lsm_free_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
- kfree(entry->lsm[i].rule);
+ security_filter_rule_free(entry->lsm[i].rule);
kfree(entry->lsm[i].args_p);
}
kfree(entry);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists