lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f1dd99d-f19d-fec2-bbe1-53b8861bfe9e@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:56:20 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix access code passed to gva_to_gpa

On 17/08/20 20:42, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> 
> Don't suppose you'd be in the mood to kill the bare 'unsigned'?
> 
>   WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'

u32 is even better.

> Alternatively, what about capturing the result in a new variable (instead of
> defining the mask) to make the wrap suck less (or just overflow like the
> current code), e.g.:
> 
>         u32 access = error_code &
>                      (PFERR_WRITE_MASK | PFERR_FETCH_MASK | PFERR_USER_MASK);
> 
>         if (!(error_code & PFERR_PRESENT_MASK) ||
>             vcpu->arch.walk_mmu->gva_to_gpa(vcpu, gva, access, &fault) != UNMAPPED_GVA) {

Sure, that's better.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ