linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.8 415/464] bitfield.h: dont compile-time validate _val in FIELD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200817143853.658940008@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:16:08 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.8 415/464] bitfield.h: dont compile-time validate _val in FIELD_FIT

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>

commit 444da3f52407d74c9aa12187ac6b01f76ee47d62 upstream.

When ur_load_imm_any() is inlined into jeq_imm(), it's possible for the
compiler to deduce a case where _val can only have the value of -1 at
compile time. Specifically,

/* struct bpf_insn: _s32 imm */
u64 imm = insn->imm; /* sign extend */
if (imm >> 32) { /* non-zero only if insn->imm is negative */
  /* inlined from ur_load_imm_any */
  u32 __imm = imm >> 32; /* therefore, always 0xffffffff */
  if (__builtin_constant_p(__imm) && __imm > 255)
    compiletime_assert_XXX()

This can result in tripping a BUILD_BUG_ON() in __BF_FIELD_CHECK() that
checks that a given value is representable in one byte (interpreted as
unsigned).

FIELD_FIT() should return true or false at runtime for whether a value
can fit for not. Don't break the build over a value that's too large for
the mask. We'd prefer to keep the inlining and compiler optimizations
though we know this case will always return false.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 1697599ee301a ("bitfield.h: add FIELD_FIT() helper")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-hardening/CAK7LNASvb0UDJ0U5wkYYRzTAdnEs64HjXpEUL7d=V0CXiAXcNw@mail.gmail.com/
Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Debugged-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 include/linux/bitfield.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/include/linux/bitfield.h
+++ b/include/linux/bitfield.h
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
  */
 #define FIELD_FIT(_mask, _val)						\
 	({								\
-		__BF_FIELD_CHECK(_mask, 0ULL, _val, "FIELD_FIT: ");	\
+		__BF_FIELD_CHECK(_mask, 0ULL, 0ULL, "FIELD_FIT: ");	\
 		!((((typeof(_mask))_val) << __bf_shf(_mask)) & ~(_mask)); \
 	})