linux-kernel - Re: Linux 5.9-rc1 (sparse? kernel/time/timekeeping.c)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200817021518.q3petwc277m3uqxz@ltop.local>
Date:   Mon, 17 Aug 2020 04:15:18 +0200
From:   Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.9-rc1 (sparse? kernel/time/timekeeping.c)

On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 06:35:26PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> on x86_64, allmodconfig:
> 
> $ gcc --version
> gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0
> 
> $ sparse --version
> 0.6.2
> 
> 
> I seem to be having some problems with kernel/time/timekeeping.c,
> including a segfault.
> 
> a. Is it sparse that segfaults?

It's most probably the one fixed in:
  eb6779f6f621 ("generic: fix missing inlining of generic expression")

On the main tree there is a branch with a few fixes since the last release:
  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/sparse/sparse.git maint-v0.6.2
 
> b. what prints this message?
> make[3]: *** Deleting file 'kernel/time/timekeeping.o'

It seems like a typical message from make when a command fails.
 
> c. I would prefer to be able to tell the source of warning/error messages,
> i.e., gcc or sparse. Especially when they are intermixed.

You can use the option -fdiagnostic-prefix[=PREFIX] for this. It will
just prefix all messages from from sparse with the given PREFIX or
'sparse: ' if none is given. You can pass this option via 'make CF=...'.

It may be a good idea to directly add it to CHECKFLAGS.

Best regards,
-- Luc