[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b061052d-592d-67d7-045f-481974b0687a@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 10:32:49 +0800
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ak@...ux.intel.com, kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com,
like.xu@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf parse-events: Set exclude_guest=1 for user-space
counting
Hi Arnaldo,
On 8/14/2020 8:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 09:21:20AM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
>> Currently if we run 'perf record -e cycles:u', exclude_guest=0.
>>
>> But it doesn't make sense in most cases that we request for
>> user-space counting but we also get the guest report.
>>
>> Of course, we also need to consider perf kvm usage case that
>> authorized perf users on the host may only want to count guest
>> user space events. For example,
>>
>> perf kvm --guest record -e cycles:u
> Ok, probably this works, but what if I want to record guest user samples
> without using 'perf kvm'?
>
> Can we have a 'U' modifier, perhaps, for that?
>
> I.e.
>
> perf record -e cycles:uU would not set exclude_host not exclude_guest,
> cycles:u excludes guest user, cycles:U excludes host user, would that be
> possible?
>
> Anyway, I think that with what we have, your patch makes sense, having a
> way to, without using 'perf kvm' still be able to sample the guest can
> be done on top. of this.
>
> Xu, can we get your Reviewed-by if this addresses your concerns?
>
> - Arnaldo
>
Do you suggest we will create a new modifier 'U' as a follow-up patch?
cycles:u - Count host user space but it doesn't count the guest user space (exclude_host = 0,
exclude_guest = 1, exclude_kernel = 1, exclude_user = 0, exclude_hv = 1)
cycles:U - Count the guest user space but it doesn't count the host user space (exclude_host = 1,
exclude_guest = 0, exclude_kernel = 1, exclude_user = 0, exclude_hv = 1)
Is above understanding correct?
Thanks
Jin Yao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists