[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200817091139.GU4354@dell>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 10:11:39 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kuba@...nel.org,
Michael Buesch <m@...s.ch>,
Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>,
Andreas Jaggi <andreas.jaggi@...erwave.ch>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
b43-dev <b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Alexander A. Klimov" <grandmaster@...klimov.de>,
Martin Langer <martin-langer@....de>,
van Dyk <kugelfang@...too.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/30] net: wireless: broadcom: b43: phy_common: Demote
non-conformant kerneldoc header
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 13:41, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> >
> > drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_common.c:467: warning: Function parameter or member 'work' not described in 'b43_phy_txpower_adjust_work'
>
> Why you can't document @work instead? Should be quite a better solution.
It some circumstances it would, but not this one.
1. This 'kernel-doc' function is not referenced from any
documentation location i.e. it is presently unused and there is no
reason for it to be kernel-doc in the first place.
2. This patch stops `scripts/find-unused-docs.sh` complaining about
phy_common.c
3. 'b43_phy_txpower_adjust_work' is the only function that has been
documented as kernel-doc - why is that? Seems like a mistake.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists