[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200817113003.20802-14-valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:29:59 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 13/17] sched/topology: Mark SD_SERIALIZE as SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS
There would be no point in preserving a sched_domain with a single group
just because it has this flag set. Add it to SD_DEGENERATE_GROUPS_MASK.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
---
include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h b/include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h
index 9043d18ce418..6eb302528659 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h
@@ -112,11 +112,12 @@ SD_FLAG(SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES, SDF_SHARED_CHILD | SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS)
* Only a single load balancing instance
*
* SHARED_PARENT: Set for all NUMA levels above NODE. Could be set from a
- * different level upwards, but it doesn't change that if a domain has this flag
- * set, then all of its parents need to have it too (otherwise the serialization
- * doesn't make sense).
+ * different level upwards, but it doesn't change that if a
+ * domain has this flag set, then all of its parents need to have
+ * it too (otherwise the serialization doesn't make sense).
+ * NEEDS_GROUPS: No point in preserving domain if it has a single group.
*/
-SD_FLAG(SD_SERIALIZE, SDF_SHARED_PARENT)
+SD_FLAG(SD_SERIALIZE, SDF_SHARED_PARENT | SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS)
/*
* Place busy tasks earlier in the domain
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists