linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 5/5] block: Remove __blk_mq_sched_bio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200817121408.GD79836@VM20190228-100.tbsite.net>
Date:   Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:14:08 +0800
From:   Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, ming.lei@...hat.com, baolin.wang7@...il.com,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 5/5] block: Remove __blk_mq_sched_bio_merge()
 helper

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 08:32:41AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:09:19PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > The blk_mq_sched_bio_merge() just wrap the __blk_mq_sched_bio_merge(), and
> > no other places will use __blk_mq_sched_bio_merge(). Thus we can combine
> > these 2 similar functions into one function.
> 
> I think the idea was to avoid the function call for the nomerges fast
> path.  Not sure if that is really worth it.

Um, no places will use __blk_mq_sched_bio_merge(), not sure if it is a
good choice we still keep an unused and similar function?

Thanks for all your good suggestion.