linux-kernel - Re: Scheduler benchmarks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHhAz+gpwxqXYUN-TghnLfCSLxciGrB8-vHvZ+12+p0tMi23eA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 22:20:12 +0530
From:   Muni Sekhar <munisekharrms@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler benchmarks

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 8:06 PM Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 08:00:11PM +0530, Muni Sekhar wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I’ve two identical Linux systems with only kernel differences.
>
> What are the differences in the kernels?
>
> > While doing kernel profiling with perf, I got the below mentioned
> > metrics for Scheduler benchmarks.
> >
> > 1st system (older kernel version compared to the other system) benchmark result:
> >
> > $ perf bench sched messaging -g 64
> > # Running 'sched/messaging' benchmark:
> > # 20 sender and receiver processes per group
> > # 64 groups == 2560 processes run
> >
> >      Total time: 2.936 [sec]
> >
> >
> > 2nd system benchmark result:
> >
> > $ perf bench sched messaging -g 64
> > # Running 'sched/messaging' benchmark:
> > # 20 sender and receiver processes per group
> > # 64 groups == 2560 processes run
> >
> >      Total time: 10.074 [sec]
> >
> >
> > So as per scheduler benchmark results, clearly a huge difference
> > between two systems.
> > Can anyone suggest to me how to dive deeper to know the root cause for
> > it.
>
> Look a the differences between your different kernels, that would be a
> great start :)
I created the difference between two kernel config files(please find
it in the attachment: config.patch) and then try to spot the
CONFIG*SCHED* differences.
Interestingly I see the difference in I/O scheduler config, 1st system
is set to “deadline” and other one is set to “cfq”. So I made it equal
by echoing to “/sys/block/<disk device>/queue/scheduler" but still no
change in scheduler benchmark.

Is it the correct way to find the differences between kernels? If so,
what other important CONFIG_* variables need to consider?


$ cat config.patch | grep -i sched

 CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK=y
 CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED=y
 CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y
 # CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED is not set
 # IO Schedulers
@@ -369,10 +434,14 @@ CONFIG_IOSCHED_NOOP=y
 CONFIG_IOSCHED_DEADLINE=y
 CONFIG_IOSCHED_CFQ=y
 CONFIG_CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED=y
-CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED="deadline"
+CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED="cfq"
+CONFIG_MQ_IOSCHED_DEADLINE=m
+CONFIG_MQ_IOSCHED_KYBER=m
+CONFIG_IOSCHED_BFQ=m
+CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED=y
 CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=y
 CONFIG_SCHED_MC=y
+CONFIG_SCHED_MC_PRIO=y
+# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_SCHEDUTIL is not set
+CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL=y

>
> good luck!
>
> greg k-h



-- 
Thanks,
Sekhar

Download attachment "config.zip" of type "application/x-zip-compressed" (41463 bytes)