linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: regulator: Convert sy8824x to json-schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <159776976828.56451.12856424120296708687.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 17:56:54 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: regulator: Convert sy8824x to json-schema

On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 14:44:36 +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Convert the sy8824x binding to DT schema format using json-schema.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: Convert sy8824x to json-schema
      commit: aedf7451e7535bc93bb9cec0ebc91744934da95c

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark