linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: rt5682: Use clk APIs better

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 17:56:01 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@...ltek.com>
Cc:     Shuming Fan <shumingf@...ltek.com>,
        Cheng-Yi Chiang <cychiang@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: rt5682: Use clk APIs better

On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:05:28 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This patch series drops a printk message down to dev_dbg() because it
> was noisy and then migrates this driver to use clk_hw based APIs instead
> of clk based APIs because this device is a clk provider, not a clk
> consumer. I've only lightly tested the last two patches but I don't have
> all combinations of clks for this device.
> 
> Cc: Cheng-Yi Chiang <cychiang@...omium.org>
> Cc: Shuming Fan <shumingf@...ltek.com>
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/3] ASoC: rt5682: Use dev_dbg() in rt5682_clk_check()
      commit: 0b95aa8e8afa4bcd49c8fa36404e2deb02a947ed
[2/3] ASoC: rt5682: Drop usage of __clk_get_name()
      commit: edbd24ea1e5c72980b37ae2d271696b05274d509
[3/3] ASoC: rt5682: Use clk_hw based APIs for registration
      commit: 653bdab267bd8dbce9cbd16bec843ca9d20a8450

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark