linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] ASoC: rockchip-spdif: add description for rk3308

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 18:39:32 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     heiko@...ech.de, Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        lgirdwood@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        sugar.zhang@...k-chips.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] ASoC: rockchip-spdif: add description for rk3308

On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 13:24:36 +0200, Johan Jonker wrote:
> A test with the command below shows that the compatible string
> 
> "rockchip,rk3308-spdif", "rockchip,rk3328-spdif"
> 
> is already in use, but is not added to a document.
> The current fallback string "rockchip,rk3328-spdif" points to a data
> set enum RK_SPDIF_RK3366 in rockchip_spdif.c that is not used both
> in the mainline as in the manufacturer kernel.
> (Of the enum only RK_SPDIF_RK3288 is used.)
> So if the properties don't change we might as well use the first SoC
> in line as fallback string and add the description for rk3308 as:
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: rockchip-spdif: add description for rk3308
      commit: a8535ae7034e3547f4f7a8c7ca03a6ee72097fb0

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark