[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200818175751.xg726hgyirbt354d@wittgenstein>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 19:57:51 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hewllig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kars de Jong <jongk@...ux-m68k.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@...fujitsu.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-h8-devel@...ts.sourceforge.jp, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce kernel_clone(), kill _do_fork()
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 06:44:47PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 07:34:00PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > The only remaining function callable outside of kernel/fork.c is
> > _do_fork(). It doesn't really follow the naming of kernel-internal
> > syscall helpers as Christoph righly pointed out. Switch all callers and
> > references to kernel_clone() and remove _do_fork() once and for all.
>
> My only concern is around return type. long, int, pid_t ... can we
> choose one and stick to it? pid_t is probably the right return type
> within the kernel, despite the return type of clone3(). It'll save us
> some work if we ever go through the hassle of growing pid_t beyond 31-bit.
It should be safe to switch kernel_clone() to return pid_t. (Afair, the
syscall wrappers all have "long" as return type. (I think Linus provided
some more details on that in another mail. Also see
include/linux/syscalls.h. So the return type for clone3() is really
somewhat a userspace thing, I think.)
I wonder whether I should take the opportunity and switch the advertised
flag arguments for the legacy clone() syscalls and kernel_thread() from
unsigned long to unsigned int so we can get rid of the lower
.flags = (lower_32_bits(clone_flags) & ~CSIGNAL),
calls I added to fix sign extension issues glibc ran into...
Christian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists