[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200818200016.GA681@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 22:00:16 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] x86: make TASK_SIZE_MAX usable from assembly code
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 12:59:05PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > I didn't see a problem bisecting, do you have something particular in
> > mind?
>
> Oh, I misunderstood this patch to be a fix for compilation. Is this just
> a correctness fix?
It prepares for using the definition from assembly, which is done in
the next patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists