linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/11] x86: make TASK_SIZE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202008181308.A4A6674@keescook>
Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 13:08:28 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] x86: make TASK_SIZE_MAX usable from assembly code

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 10:00:16PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 12:59:05PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > I didn't see a problem bisecting, do you have something particular in
> > > mind?
> > 
> > Oh, I misunderstood this patch to be a fix for compilation. Is this just
> > a correctness fix?
> 
> It prepares for using the definition from assembly, which is done in
> the next patch.

Ah! Okay; thanks.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook