[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200818070010.GA2365@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 09:00:10 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@....com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Mikhail Skorzhinskii <mskorzhinskiy@...arflare.com>,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] net: introduce helper sendpage_ok() in
include/linux/net.h
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:12:12PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>
> So netdev people will have to understand and support PageSlab() or
> page_count()?
Yes. As they came up with that contrived rule what is acceptable
for sendpage. No one else really knows and other subsystems like the
block layer are perfectly fine with it.
>
> If it is unusual even for mm people, how could netdev people suppose
> to understand this unusual mm bug? At least not any better.
It is not a mm bug, it is a networking quirk.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists