[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200818083136.GX2639@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 14:01:36 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: "Liao, Bard" <bard.liao@...el.com>
Cc: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tiwai@...e.de" <tiwai@...e.de>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jank@...ence.com" <jank@...ence.com>,
"srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org" <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
"rander.wang@...ux.intel.com" <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
"ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com"
<ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
"hui.wang@...onical.com" <hui.wang@...onical.com>,
"pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com"
<pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kale, Sanyog R" <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>,
"Lin, Mengdong" <mengdong.lin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] soundwire: add definition for maximum number of ports
On 18-08-20, 06:53, Liao, Bard wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 2:36 PM
> > To: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; tiwai@...e.de;
> > broonie@...nel.org; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; jank@...ence.com;
> > srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org; rander.wang@...ux.intel.com;
> > ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com; hui.wang@...onical.com; pierre-
> > louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com; Kale, Sanyog R <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>; Lin,
> > Mengdong <mengdong.lin@...el.com>; Liao, Bard <bard.liao@...el.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] soundwire: add definition for maximum number of
> > ports
> >
> > On 18-08-20, 01:47, Bard Liao wrote:
> > > From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > A Device may have at most 15 physical ports (DP0, DP1..DP14).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart
> > > <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski
> > > <guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
> > > b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h index 76052f12c9f7..0aa4c6af7554
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
> > > @@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ struct sdw_slave;
> > > #define SDW_FRAME_CTRL_BITS 48
> > > #define SDW_MAX_DEVICES 11
> > >
> > > -#define SDW_VALID_PORT_RANGE(n) ((n) <= 14 && (n) >= 1)
> > > +#define SDW_MAX_PORTS 15
> > > +#define SDW_VALID_PORT_RANGE(n) ((n) <
> > SDW_MAX_PORTS && (n) >= 1)
> >
> > What is the use of this one if we are allocating all ports always, Also, I dont
> > see it used in second patch?
>
> It is used in drivers/soundwire/stream.c and drivers/soundwire/debugfs.c.
Ah overlooked that it is modified, pls ignore this comment
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists