linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: add emulation for zone-append

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200818095033.h6ybdwiq3ljagl5a@mpHalley.local>
Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:50:33 +0200
From:   Javier Gonzalez <javier@...igon.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@...sung.com>, kbusch@...nel.org,
        Damien.LeMoal@....com, axboe@...nel.dk, sagi@...mberg.me,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        johannes.thumshirn@....com, Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>,
        SelvaKumar S <selvakuma.s1@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: add emulation for zone-append

On 18.08.2020 09:12, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 10:59:36AM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
>> If drive does not support zone-append natively, enable emulation using
>> regular write.
>> Make emulated zone-append cmd write-lock the zone, preventing
>> concurrent append/write on the same zone.
>
>I really don't think we should add this.  ZNS and the Linux support
>were all designed with Zone Append in mind, and then your company did
>the nastiest possible move violating the normal NVMe procedures to make
>it optional.  But that doesn't change the fact the Linux should keep
>requiring it, especially with the amount of code added here and how it
>hooks in the fast path.

I understand that the NVMe process was agitated and that the current ZNS
implementation in Linux relies in append support from the device
perspective. However, the current TP does allow for not implementing
append, and a number of customers are requiring the use of normal
writes, which we want to support.

During the initial patch review we discussed this and we agreed that the
block layer is designed for append on zone devices, and that for the
foreseeable future this was not going to change. We therefore took the
feedback and followed a similar approach as in the SCSI driver for
implementing append emulation.

We are happy to do more characterization on the impact of these hooks in
the non-zoned hast path and eventually changing the approach if this
proves to be a problem. Our thought is to isolate any potential
performance degradation to the zoned path using the emulation (we do not
see any ATM).

Do you have any early suggestion on how you this patch should look like
to be upstreamable?

Javier