[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1597715898-3854-1-git-send-email-chinwen.chang@mediatek.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 09:58:15 +0800
From: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@...iatek.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@...iatek.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Jimmy Assarsson <jimmyassarsson@...il.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Daniel Kiss <daniel.kiss@....com>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] Try to release mmap_lock temporarily in smaps_rollup
Recently, we have observed some janky issues caused by unpleasantly long
contention on mmap_lock which is held by smaps_rollup when probing large
processes. To address the problem, we let smaps_rollup detect if anyone
wants to acquire mmap_lock for write attempts. If yes, just release the
lock temporarily to ease the contention.
smaps_rollup is a procfs interface which allows users to summarize the
process's memory usage without the overhead of seq_* calls. Android uses it
to sample the memory usage of various processes to balance its memory pool
sizes. If no one wants to take the lock for write requests, smaps_rollup
with this patch will behave like the original one.
Although there are on-going mmap_lock optimizations like range-based locks,
the lock applied to smaps_rollup would be the coarse one, which is hard to
avoid the occurrence of aforementioned issues. So the detection and
temporary release for write attempts on mmap_lock in smaps_rollup is still
necessary.
Change since v1:
- If current VMA is freed after dropping the lock, it will return
- incomplete result. To fix this issue, refine the code flow as
- suggested by Steve. [1]
Change since v2:
- When getting back the mmap lock, the address where you stopped last
- time could now be in the middle of a vma. Add one more check to handle
- this case as suggested by Michel. [2]
Change since v3:
- last_stopped is easily confused with last_vma_end. Replace it with
- a direct call to smap_gather_stats(vma, &mss, last_vma_end) as
- suggested by Steve. [3]
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/bf40676e-b14b-44cd-75ce-419c70194783@arm.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CANN689FtCsC71cjAjs0GPspOhgo_HRj+diWsoU1wr98YPktgWg@mail.gmail.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/db0d40e2-72f3-09d5-c162-9c49218f128f@arm.com/
Chinwen Chang (3):
mmap locking API: add mmap_lock_is_contended()
mm: smaps*: extend smap_gather_stats to support specified beginning
mm: proc: smaps_rollup: do not stall write attempts on mmap_lock
fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
include/linux/mmap_lock.h | 5 ++
2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists