linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: Fix sleeping while atomic BUG() on OOM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:30:17 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: Fix sleeping while atomic BUG() on OOM

On 2020-08-18 11:16, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 08:31:08AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 11/08/20 12:27, Will Deacon wrote:
>> > Will Deacon (2):
>> >   KVM: Pass MMU notifier range flags to kvm_unmap_hva_range()
>> >   KVM: arm64: Only reschedule if MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_BLOCKABLE is not set
>> >
>> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h   |  2 +-
>> >  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c                | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
>> >  arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h    |  2 +-
>> >  arch/mips/kvm/mmu.c                 |  3 ++-
>> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  3 ++-
>> >  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c           |  3 ++-
>> >  arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c    |  3 ++-
>> >  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h     |  3 ++-
>> >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c              |  3 ++-
>> >  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c                 |  3 ++-
>> >  10 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>> >
>> 
>> These would be okay for 5.9 too, so I plan to queue them myself before
>> we fork for 5.10.
> 
> Thanks, Paolo. Let me know if you want me to rebase/repost.
> 
> Please note that I'm planning on rewriting most of the arm64 KVM 
> page-table
> code for 5.10, so if you can get this series in early (e.g. for -rc2), 
> then
> it would _really_ help with managing the kvm/arm64 queue for the next 
> merge
> window.
> 
> Otherwise, could you and Marc please set up a shared branch with just 
> these,
> so I can use it as a base?
> 
> Please let me know.

Given that this doesn't directly applies to -rc1, I'll push out a branch
shortly with the conflicts resolved.

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...