linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: mcp23s08: Fixups for mcp23x17

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <13c56cdc-ecb4-6590-7233-887397f1cd97@codethink.co.uk>
Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:09:10 +0100
From:   Thomas Preston <thomas.preston@...ethink.co.uk>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: mcp23s08: Fixups for mcp23x17

On 17/08/2020 20:29, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 02:56:54PM +0100, Thomas Preston wrote:
>> Actually I think I'm wrong about the interrupt-controller changes in patches
>> 0002 and 0003.
> 
> You are. Looking at the datasheet, the GPIOs have interrupt capability.
> GPIO controllers are typically both an interrupt client and provider.

Thanks for the clarification.

I still think the patch 0001 is required. The precious and volatile 
ranges are broken.