linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: os_dep: fix coding style issue in xmit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200818140444.GB547677@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 16:04:44 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Mohammed Rushad <mohammedrushad@...il.com>
Cc:     vkor@...en.in, hdegoede@...hat.com, Larry.Finger@...inger.net,
        john.oldman@...ehill.co.uk, yanaijie@...wei.com,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: os_dep: fix coding style issue in
 xmit_linux.c

On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 12:26:44AM +0530, Mohammed Rushad wrote:
> This is a patch to the xmit_linux.c file that fixes brace and missing
> line warning found by checkpatch.pl tool
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Rushad <mohammedrushad@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/xmit_linux.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/xmit_linux.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/xmit_linux.c
> index fec8a8caaa46..b199d355e568 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/xmit_linux.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/xmit_linux.c
> @@ -148,13 +148,13 @@ static int rtw_mlcst2unicst(struct adapter *padapter, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	/* free sta asoc_queue */
>  	while (phead != plist) {
>  		int stainfo_offset;
> +
>  		psta = LIST_CONTAINOR(plist, struct sta_info, asoc_list);
>  		plist = get_next(plist);
>  
>  		stainfo_offset = rtw_stainfo_offset(pstapriv, psta);
> -		if (stainfo_offset_valid(stainfo_offset)) {
> +		if (stainfo_offset_valid(stainfo_offset))
>  			chk_alive_list[chk_alive_num++] = stainfo_offset;
> -		}
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock_bh(&pstapriv->asoc_list_lock);
>  

As trivial as it is, this is still two different things in a single
patch :(

If this was the last remaining issue in this file, I might consider it,
but it isn't, so please break up your changes into
one-type-of-change-per-patch.

thanks,

greg k-h