linux-kernel - [PATCH v7 15/18] static_call: Add some validation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200818135805.161974981@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:57:50 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     x86@...nel.org
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, bristot@...hat.com,
        jbaron@...mai.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, namit@...are.com,
        hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
        jpoimboe@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk
Subject: [PATCH v7 15/18] static_call: Add some validation

Verify the text we're about to change is as we expect it to be.

Requested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c
@@ -41,6 +41,26 @@ static void __static_call_transform(void
 	text_poke_bp(insn, code, size, NULL);
 }
 
+static void __static_call_validate(void *insn, bool tail)
+{
+	u8 opcode = *(u8 *)insn;
+
+	if (tail) {
+		if (opcode == JMP32_INSN_OPCODE ||
+		    opcode == RET_INSN_OPCODE)
+			return;
+	} else {
+		if (opcode == CALL_INSN_OPCODE ||
+		    !memcmp(insn, ideal_nops[NOP_ATOMIC5], 5))
+			return;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If we ever trigger this, our text is corrupt, we'll probably not live long.
+	 */
+	WARN_ONCE(1, "unexpected static_call insn opcode 0x%x at %pS\n", opcode, insn);
+}
+
 static inline enum insn_type __sc_insn(bool null, bool tail)
 {
 	/*
@@ -60,11 +80,15 @@ void arch_static_call_transform(void *si
 {
 	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
 
-	if (tramp)
+	if (tramp) {
+		__static_call_validate(tramp, true);
 		__static_call_transform(tramp, __sc_insn(!func, true), func);
+	}
 
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE) && site)
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE) && site) {
+		__static_call_validate(site, tail);
 		__static_call_transform(site, __sc_insn(!func, tail), func);
+	}
 
 	mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
 }