lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200818151707.GD1236603@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 16:17:07 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] coredump: Let dump_emit() bail out on short writes

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 03:40:28PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/18, Jann Horn wrote:
> >
> > +	if (dump_interrupted())
> > +		return 0;
> > +	n = __kernel_write(file, addr, nr, &pos);
> > +	if (n != nr)
> > +		return 0;
> > +	file->f_pos = pos;
> 
> Just curious, can't we simply do
> 
> 	__kernel_write(file, addr, nr, &file->f_pos);
> 
> and avoid "loff_t pos" ?

	Bloody bad pattern; it would be (probably) safe in this case,
but in general ->f_pos is shared data.  Exposing it to fuckloads of
->write() instances is a bad idea - we had bugs like that.

	General rule: never pass an address of ->f_pos to anything,
and limit access to it as much as possible.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ