linux-kernel - Re: Scheduler benchmarks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <135393.1597855432@turing-police>
Date:   Wed, 19 Aug 2020 12:43:52 -0400
From:   "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
To:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     Muni Sekhar <munisekharrms@...il.com>,
        peter enderborg <peter.enderborg@...y.com>,
        kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler benchmarks

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 12:42:54 +0200, Greg KH said:
> Look up Spectre and Meltdown for many many examples of what happened and
> what went wrong with chip designs and how we had to fix these things in
> the kernel a few years ago.

And I'm sure that nobody sane thinks we're done with security holes
caused by speculative execution... :)



Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped