lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1dfcc278-98cf-525c-7f35-483f461b2f5c@fb.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Aug 2020 12:15:18 -0700
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>, <jakub@...udflare.com>,
        <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     <kernel-team@...udflare.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] bpf: sockmap: call sock_map_update_elem
 directly



On 8/19/20 2:24 AM, Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> Don't go via map->ops to call sock_map_update_elem, since we know
> what function to call in bpf_map_update_value. Since
> check_map_func_compatibility doesn't allow calling
> BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem from BPF context, we can remove
> ops->map_update_elem and rename the function to
> sock_map_update_elem_sys.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ