linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add GARDENA smart Gateway AT91SAM board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:04:48 +0200
From:   Reto Schneider <code@...o-schneider.ch>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Reto Schneider <reto.schneider@...qvarnagroup.com>,
        Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>,
        Michael Zimmermann <michael.zimmermann@...ndcentrix.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add GARDENA smart Gateway AT91SAM board

Hi Alexandre,

On 8/17/20 12:21 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Thank you for this submission.

Thanks a lot for the feedback.

I will send a v2.

> Overall, I'm not convinced it is a good idea to start from
> at91sam9x5ek.dtsi as it makes you dtb bigger than necessary but if you
> want it that way, I'm fine with that.

Because using at91sam9x5ek.dtsi saves some code (maintenance effort?!) I
am willing to accept the extra binary size.
However, if you think that this causes the maintenance efforts to be
greater than when doing it your way, I'd be up for changing it.

Kind regards,
Reto

Download attachment "0xBFB93E8F422586E0.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (2376 bytes)