[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200819093331.GD1891694@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 12:33:31 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Raul Rangel <rrangel@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] serial: 8250: change lock order in
serial8250_do_startup()
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 06:27:26PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/08/19 11:21), Petr Mladek wrote:
> >
> > The patch is committed in printk/linux.git, branch for-5.10.
>
> Petr, as far as I can tell, Greg has applied it to gregkh/tty.git
It's fine to have it in two or more repos, during merge the first one will go,
the second and consequent will be just no-op. It works the same way as
immutable branches/tags.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists