linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.9-rc1: graphics regression moved from -next to mainline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg34bw1ude07nC_XCPOJHZ21-v6117p4574d5S7iP4gxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 18:59:27 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
        intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.9-rc1: graphics regression moved from -next to mainline

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 6:13 PM Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I think there's been some discussion about reverting that change for
> other reasons, but it's quite likely the culprit.

Hmm. It reverts cleanly, but the end result doesn't work, because of
other changes.

Reverting all of

   763fedd6a216 ("drm/i915: Remove i915_gem_object_get_dirty_page()")
   7ac2d2536dfa ("drm/i915/gem: Delete unused code")
   9e0f9464e2ab ("drm/i915/gem: Async GPU relocations only")

seems to at least build.

Pavel, does doing those three reverts make things work for you?

               Linus