[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200819020503.3079-4-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:05:02 +0800
From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] libnvdimm/bus: simplify walk_to_nvdimm_bus()
I first want to move dev_WARN_ONCE() after "if (dev)" branch, but further
I find the "if (dev)" can only be true when is_nvdimm_bus(dev) successed.
No functional change. In fact, the compiler can optimize it correctly. I
run "size drivers/nvdimm/bus.o" and find nothing has changed. So it's
just source code level optimization, make us can read it faster.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
---
drivers/nvdimm/bus.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c b/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c
index 955265656b96c73..1d89114cb6ab93e 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c
@@ -316,10 +316,9 @@ struct nvdimm_bus *walk_to_nvdimm_bus(struct device *nd_dev)
for (dev = nd_dev; dev; dev = dev->parent)
if (is_nvdimm_bus(dev))
- break;
- dev_WARN_ONCE(nd_dev, !dev, "invalid dev, not on nd bus\n");
- if (dev)
- return to_nvdimm_bus(dev);
+ return to_nvdimm_bus(dev);
+
+ dev_WARN_ONCE(nd_dev, 1, "invalid dev, not on nd bus\n");
return NULL;
}
--
1.8.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists