[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200819024858.GA25038@chenyu-office.sh.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:48:58 +0800
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] ACPI: processor: Print more information when
acpi_processor_evaluate_cst() failed
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 12:46:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 5:12 PM Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > Some platforms have bogus _CST which might cause expectd behavior
> > in the cpu idle driver. Some bogus _CST might be unable to be
> > disassembled by acpica-tools due to broken format.
> > Print extra log if the _CST extraction/verification failed.
> > This can be used to help the user narrow down why the cpu
> > idle driver fails to behave as expected.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
>
> This is fine by me as a general idea, but please change the log level to "info".
>
Okay, I will send a new version. Thanks!
thanks,
Chenyu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists