lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:48:58 +0800 From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] ACPI: processor: Print more information when acpi_processor_evaluate_cst() failed On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 12:46:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 5:12 PM Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com> wrote: > > > > Some platforms have bogus _CST which might cause expectd behavior > > in the cpu idle driver. Some bogus _CST might be unable to be > > disassembled by acpica-tools due to broken format. > > Print extra log if the _CST extraction/verification failed. > > This can be used to help the user narrow down why the cpu > > idle driver fails to behave as expected. > > > > Suggested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com> > > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com> > > This is fine by me as a general idea, but please change the log level to "info". > Okay, I will send a new version. Thanks! thanks, Chenyu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists