linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RFC] ACPI: processor: Print more information when acpi_processor_evaluate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:48:58 +0800
From:   Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] ACPI: processor: Print more information when
 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst() failed

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 12:46:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 5:12 PM Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > Some platforms have bogus _CST which might cause expectd behavior
> > in the cpu idle driver. Some bogus _CST might be unable to be
> > disassembled by acpica-tools due to broken format.
> > Print extra log if the _CST extraction/verification failed.
> > This can be used to help the user narrow down why the cpu
> > idle driver fails to behave as expected.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
> 
> This is fine by me as a general idea, but please change the log level to "info".
>
Okay, I will send a new version. Thanks!

thanks,
Chenyu