[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200819131233.GA2403519@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:12:33 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Landen Chao <landen.chao@...iatek.com>
Cc: "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com"
<vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sean Wang <Sean.Wang@...iatek.com>,
"opensource@...rst.com" <opensource@...rst.com>,
"frank-w@...lic-files.de" <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
"dqfext@...il.com" <dqfext@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] net: dsa: mt7530: Add the support of
MT7531 switch
> In general, according to phy.rst, RGMII delay should be done by phy, but
> some MoCA product need RGMII delay in MAC. These two requirements
> conflict. Is there any suggestion to solve the conflict?
Implementing the delay in the PHY is just a recommendation, not a
requirement. However, as i said, you need to be careful what is pass
to phylib. If the MAC is implementing "rgmii-id", whatever makes it
way down to phy_attach_direct() needs to be "rgmii". If the MAC
implements "rgmii-rxid", the phy should be implementing "rgmii-txid",
etc. If this is wrong, you get both the MAC and the PHY implementing
delays, and bad things happen.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists