linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 13/20] drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_downstream_read_info()

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <20200819151547.GB46474@art_vandelay>
Date:   Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:15:53 -0400
From:   Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
To:     Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc:     nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@...el.com>,
        Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@...el.com>,
        Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@...el.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        José Roberto de Souza 
        <jose.souza@...el.com>, Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 13/20] drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_downstream_read_info()

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 04:04:50PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> We're going to be doing the same probing process in nouveau for
> determining downstream DP port capabilities, so let's deduplicate the
> work by moving i915's code for handling this into a shared helper:
> drm_dp_downstream_read_info().
> 
> Note that when we do this, we also do make some functional changes while
> we're at it:
> * We always clear the downstream port info before trying to read it,
>   just to make things easier for the caller
> * We skip reading downstream port info if the DPCD indicates that we
>   don't support downstream port info
> * We only read as many bytes as needed for the reported number of
>   downstream ports, no sense in reading the whole thing every time
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c         | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 14 ++---------
>  include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h             |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index 4c21cf69dad5a..9703b33599c3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -423,6 +423,38 @@ bool drm_dp_send_real_edid_checksum(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_send_real_edid_checksum);
>  
> +/**
> + * drm_dp_downstream_read_info() - read DPCD downstream port info if available
> + * @aux: DisplayPort AUX channel
> + * @dpcd: A cached copy of the port's DPCD
> + * @downstream_ports: buffer to store the downstream port info in
> + *
> + * Returns: 0 if either the downstream port info was read successfully or
> + * there was no downstream info to read, or a negative error code otherwise.
> + */
> +int drm_dp_downstream_read_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> +				const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE],
> +				u8 downstream_ports[DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS])
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	u8 len;
> +
> +	memset(downstream_ports, 0, DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS);
> +
> +	/* No downstream info to read */
> +	if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) ||
> +	    dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10 ||
> +	    !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	len = (dpcd[DP_DOWN_STREAM_PORT_COUNT] & DP_PORT_COUNT_MASK) * 4;

I'm having a hard time rationalizing DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS being 16, but only
having 4 ports worth of data in the DP_DOWNSTREAM_PORT_* registers. Do you know
what's supposed to happen if dpcd[DP_DOWN_STREAM_PORT_COUNT] is > 4?

Sean

> +	ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(aux, DP_DOWNSTREAM_PORT_0, downstream_ports,
> +			       len);
> +
> +	return ret == len ? 0 : -EIO;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_downstream_read_info);
> +
>  /**
>   * drm_dp_downstream_max_clock() - extract branch device max
>   *                                 pixel rate for legacy VGA
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 1e29d3a012856..984e49194ca31 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4685,18 +4685,8 @@ intel_dp_get_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  			return false;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!drm_dp_is_branch(intel_dp->dpcd))
> -		return true; /* native DP sink */
> -
> -	if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] == 0x10)
> -		return true; /* no per-port downstream info */
> -
> -	if (drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_DOWNSTREAM_PORT_0,
> -			     intel_dp->downstream_ports,
> -			     DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS) < 0)
> -		return false; /* downstream port status fetch failed */
> -
> -	return true;
> +	return drm_dp_downstream_read_info(&intel_dp->aux, intel_dp->dpcd,
> +					   intel_dp->downstream_ports) == 0;
>  }
>  
>  static bool
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> index 5c28199248626..1349f16564ace 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> @@ -1613,6 +1613,9 @@ int drm_dp_dpcd_read_link_status(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
>  bool drm_dp_send_real_edid_checksum(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
>  				    u8 real_edid_checksum);
>  
> +int drm_dp_downstream_read_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> +				const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE],
> +				u8 downstream_ports[DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS]);
>  int drm_dp_downstream_max_clock(const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE],
>  				const u8 port_cap[4]);
>  int drm_dp_downstream_max_bpc(const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE],
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives