[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e8185af-08fc-18c3-c1ca-fa1f7d4665dd@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:19:15 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] KVM: nSVM: rename nested 'vmcb' to vmcb_gpa in few
places
On 20/08/20 12:00, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>> Please use vmcb12_gpa, and svm->nested.vmcb12 for the VMCB in patch 6.
>>
>> (You probably also what to have local variables named vmcb12 in patch 6
>> to avoid too-long lines).
> The limit was raised to 100 chars recently, thats why I allowed some lines to
> go over 80 characters to avoid adding too much noise.
>
True, but having svm->nested.vmcb12->control repeated all over isn't
pretty. :)
Since you're going to touch all lines anyway, adding the local variable
is a good idea.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists