[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200820113056.GG4353@alley>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:30:56 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Balamuruhan S <bala24@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com, rdna@...com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, gpiccoli@...onical.com,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com,
sandipan@...ux.ibm.com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/watchdog: fix warning -Wunused-variable for
watchdog_allowed_mask in ppc64
On Fri 2020-08-14 19:03:30, Balamuruhan S wrote:
> In ppc64 config if `CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR` is not set then it
> warns for unused declaration of `watchdog_allowed_mask` while building,
> move the declaration inside ifdef later in the code.
>
> ```
> kernel/watchdog.c:47:23: warning: ‘watchdog_allowed_mask’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
> static struct cpumask watchdog_allowed_mask __read_mostly;
> ```
>
> Signed-off-by: Balamuruhan S <bala24@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/watchdog.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
> index 5abb5b22ad13..33c9b8a3d51b 100644
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ int __read_mostly soft_watchdog_user_enabled = 1;
> int __read_mostly watchdog_thresh = 10;
> static int __read_mostly nmi_watchdog_available;
>
> -static struct cpumask watchdog_allowed_mask __read_mostly;
>
> struct cpumask watchdog_cpumask __read_mostly;
> unsigned long *watchdog_cpumask_bits = cpumask_bits(&watchdog_cpumask);
> @@ -166,6 +165,7 @@ int __read_mostly sysctl_softlockup_all_cpu_backtrace;
> unsigned int __read_mostly softlockup_panic =
> CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_SOFTLOCKUP_PANIC_VALUE;
>
> +static struct cpumask watchdog_allowed_mask __read_mostly;
I could confirm that the variable is used only in code that is built
when CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR is enabled.
Note that the problem can't be seen on x86. There the softlockup
detector is enforced together with hardloclup detector via
via HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF.
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists