linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/8] KVM: nSVM: implement ondemand allocation of the nested state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <faedeeb06b63a115a1ab733b1226ae6822d2a907.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:02:15 +0300
From:   Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] KVM: nSVM: implement ondemand allocation of the
 nested state

On Thu, 2020-08-20 at 11:58 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 20/08/20 11:13, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > @@ -3912,6 +3914,14 @@ static int svm_pre_leave_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const char *smstate)
> >  	vmcb_gpa = GET_SMSTATE(u64, smstate, 0x7ee0);
> >  
> >  	if (guest) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * This can happen if SVM was not enabled prior to #SMI,
> > +		 * but guest corrupted the #SMI state and marked it as
> > +		 * enabled it there
> > +		 */
> > +		if (!svm->nested.initialized)
> > +			return 1;
> > +
> >  		if (kvm_vcpu_map(&svm->vcpu, gpa_to_gfn(vmcb_gpa), &map) == -EINVAL)
> >  			return 1;
> 
> This can also happen if you live migrate while in SMM (EFER.SVME=0).
> You need to check for the SVME bit in the SMM state save area, and:
> 
> 1) triple fault if it is clear
> 
> 2) call svm_allocate_nested if it is set.
> 
> Paolo
> 
Makes sense, will do.

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky