[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200820091604.594853618@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 11:20:17 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 044/212] x86/i8259: Use printk_deferred() to prevent deadlock
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
commit bdd65589593edd79b6a12ce86b3b7a7c6dae5208 upstream.
0day reported a possible circular locking dependency:
Chain exists of:
&irq_desc_lock_class --> console_owner --> &port_lock_key
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&port_lock_key);
lock(console_owner);
lock(&port_lock_key);
lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
The reason for this is a printk() in the i8259 interrupt chip driver
which is invoked with the irq descriptor lock held, which reverses the
lock operations vs. printk() from arbitrary contexts.
Switch the printk() to printk_deferred() to avoid that.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87365abt2v.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ spurious_8259A_irq:
* lets ACK and report it. [once per IRQ]
*/
if (!(spurious_irq_mask & irqmask)) {
- printk(KERN_DEBUG
+ printk_deferred(KERN_DEBUG
"spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ%d.\n", irq);
spurious_irq_mask |= irqmask;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists