linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl-intel tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200820094036.GU1891694@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:40:36 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl-intel tree

On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:30:39AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the pinctrl-intel tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.o: in function `byt_pinctrl_probe':
> pinctrl-baytrail.c:(.text+0x12bf): undefined reference to `intel_pinctrl_get_soc_data'
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   2db97df9f29d ("pinctrl: baytrail: Switch to use intel_pinctrl_get_soc_data()")

Right, I have updated it. Shouldn't be issues now.

> CONFIG_PINCTRL_BAYTRAIL=y
> CONFIG_PINCTRL_INTEL=m
> 
> I have ised the pinctrl-intel tree from next-20200819 for today.

Thanks!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko