lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200820091623.916974874@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 20 Aug 2020 11:21:21 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Sandeep Raghuraman <sandy.8925@...il.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.8 230/232] drm/amdgpu: Fix bug where DPM is not enabled after hibernate and resume

From: Sandeep Raghuraman <sandy.8925@...il.com>

commit f87812284172a9809820d10143b573d833cd3f75 upstream.

Reproducing bug report here:
After hibernating and resuming, DPM is not enabled. This remains the case
even if you test hibernate using the steps here:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/power/basic-pm-debugging.html

I debugged the problem, and figured out that in the file hardwaremanager.c,
in the function, phm_enable_dynamic_state_management(), the check
'if (!hwmgr->pp_one_vf && smum_is_dpm_running(hwmgr) && !amdgpu_passthrough(adev) && adev->in_suspend)'
returns true for the hibernate case, and false for the suspend case.

This means that for the hibernate case, the AMDGPU driver doesn't enable DPM
(even though it should) and simply returns from that function.
In the suspend case, it goes ahead and enables DPM, even though it doesn't need to.

I debugged further, and found out that in the case of suspend, for the
CIK/Hawaii GPUs, smum_is_dpm_running(hwmgr) returns false, while in the case of
hibernate, smum_is_dpm_running(hwmgr) returns true.

For CIK, the ci_is_dpm_running() function calls the ci_is_smc_ram_running() function,
which is ultimately used to determine if DPM is currently enabled or not,
and this seems to provide the wrong answer.

I've changed the ci_is_dpm_running() function to instead use the same method that
some other AMD GPU chips do (e.g Fiji), which seems to read the voltage controller.
I've tested on my R9 390 and it seems to work correctly for both suspend and
hibernate use cases, and has been stable so far.

Bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208839
Signed-off-by: Sandeep Raghuraman <sandy.8925@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/ci_smumgr.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/ci_smumgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/ci_smumgr.c
@@ -2725,7 +2725,10 @@ static int ci_initialize_mc_reg_table(st
 
 static bool ci_is_dpm_running(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
 {
-	return ci_is_smc_ram_running(hwmgr);
+	return (1 == PHM_READ_INDIRECT_FIELD(hwmgr->device,
+					     CGS_IND_REG__SMC, FEATURE_STATUS,
+					     VOLTAGE_CONTROLLER_ON))
+		? true : false;
 }
 
 static int ci_smu_init(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ