[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200820132924.GA8670@sasha-vm>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 09:29:24 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Wei Hu <weh@...rosoft.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.8 164/232] PCI: hv: Fix a timing issue which causes
kdump to fail occasionally
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 01:00:51PM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
>From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2020 2:20 AM
>>
>> From: Wei Hu <weh@...rosoft.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit d6af2ed29c7c1c311b96dac989dcb991e90ee195 ]
>>
>> Kdump could fail sometime on Hyper-V guest because the retry in
>> hv_pci_enter_d0() releases child device structures in hv_pci_bus_exit().
>>
>> Although there is a second asynchronous device relations message sending
>> from the host, if this message arrives to the guest after
>> hv_send_resource_allocated() is called, the retry would fail.
>>
>> Fix the problem by moving retry to hv_pci_probe() and start the retry
>> from hv_pci_query_relations() call. This will cause a device relations
>> message to arrive to the guest synchronously; the guest would then be
>> able to rebuild the child device structures before calling
>> hv_send_resource_allocated().
>>
>> Link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hyperv/20200727071731.18516-1-weh@microsoft.com/
>> Fixes: c81992e7f4aa ("PCI: hv: Retry PCI bus D0 entry on invalid device state")
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Hu <weh@...rosoft.com>
>> [lorenzo.pieralisi@....com: fixed a comment and commit log]
>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
>> Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 71 +++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>
>
>This patch came through three days ago, and I indicated then that we don't want
>it backported to 5.8 and earlier.
Uh, I re-added it by mistake, sorry.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists