linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] thermal: sysfs: fall back to vzalloc for cooling device's statistics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200820105736.000019d4.zbestahu@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:57:36 +0800
From:   Yue Hu <zbestahu@...il.com>
To:     Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, huyue2@...ong.com,
        zbestahu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: sysfs: fall back to vzalloc for cooling
 device's statistics

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 16:47:01 +0530
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 12:00 PM Yue Hu <zbestahu@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Yue Hu <huyue2@...ong.com>
> >
> > We observed warning about kzalloc() when register thermal cooling device
> > in backlight_device_register(). backlight display can be a cooling device
> > since reducing screen brightness will can help reduce temperature.
> >
> > However, ->get_max_state of backlight will assign max brightness of 1024
> > to states. The memory size can be getting 1MB+ due to states * states.
> > That is so large to trigger kmalloc() warning.
> >
> > So, let's remove it and try vzalloc() if kzalloc() fails.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@...ong.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c | 8 ++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
> > index aa99edb..9bae0b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
> > @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
> >  #include <linux/device.h>
> >  #include <linux/err.h>
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> > +#include <linux/mm.h>
> >  #include <linux/string.h>
> >  #include <linux/jiffies.h>
> >
> > @@ -919,7 +921,9 @@ static void cooling_device_stats_setup(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
> >         var += sizeof(*stats->time_in_state) * states;
> >         var += sizeof(*stats->trans_table) * states * states;
> >
> > -       stats = kzalloc(var, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +       stats = kzalloc(var, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
> > +       if (!stats)
> > +               stats = vzalloc(var);  
> 
> Couldn't this be replaced by kvzalloc()?

Yes, it should be more better as kvzalloc has a vmalloc fallback.

Thx.

> 
> >         if (!stats)
> >                 return;
> >
> > @@ -938,7 +942,7 @@ static void cooling_device_stats_setup(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
> >
> >  static void cooling_device_stats_destroy(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
> >  {
> > -       kfree(cdev->stats);
> > +       kvfree(cdev->stats);
> >         cdev->stats = NULL;
> >  }
> >
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >