[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aab48f12-5c2a-8e01-8dcb-16669fda7526@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:43:16 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: FSGSBASE causing panic on 5.9-rc1
On 19/08/20 23:25, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> wrmsrl(MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE, current->thread.gsbase);
> load_gs_index(svm->host.gs);
>
> Surely that should do load_gs_index() *before* wrmsrl(). But that's
> not the problem at hand.
The wrmsrl is writing the inactive GS base so the ordering between
load_gs_index and wrmsrl(MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE) should be irrelevant?
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists