[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLE9SkLY5V=D=Ot1oyLkbAORagfozYqxk1iNDW6b7QZrwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:02:10 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...il.com>
To: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Wen Yang <wenyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mm/slub: Fix count_partial() problem
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 3:18 PM Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> v1->v2:
> - Improved changelog and variable naming for PATCH 1~2.
> - PATCH3 adds per-cpu counter to avoid performance regression
> in concurrent __slab_free().
>
> [Testing]
> On my 32-cpu 2-socket physical machine:
> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz
> perf stat --null --repeat 10 -- hackbench 20 thread 20000
>
> == original, no patched
> 19.211637055 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.57% )
>
> == patched with patch1~2
> Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 20 thread 20000' (10 runs):
>
> 21.731833146 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.17% )
>
> == patched with patch1~3
> Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 20 thread 20000' (10 runs):
>
> 19.112106847 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.64% )
>
>
> Xunlei Pang (3):
> mm/slub: Introduce two counters for partial objects
> mm/slub: Get rid of count_partial()
> mm/slub: Use percpu partial free counter
>
> mm/slab.h | 2 +
> mm/slub.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
We probably need to wrap the counters under CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG because
AFAICT all the code that uses them is also wrapped under it.
An alternative approach for this patch would be to somehow make the
lock in count_partial() more granular, but I don't know how feasible
that actually is.
Anyway, I am OK with this approach:
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
You still need to convince Christoph, though, because he had
objections over this approach.
- Pekka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists