[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXoquUOZEtYUHA8ZgbihbUHK=ShaHndy5Tk4WUFJrjqqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:51:10 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: FSGSBASE causing panic on 5.9-rc1
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 6:43 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 19/08/20 23:25, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > wrmsrl(MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE, current->thread.gsbase);
> > load_gs_index(svm->host.gs);
> >
> > Surely that should do load_gs_index() *before* wrmsrl(). But that's
> > not the problem at hand.
>
> The wrmsrl is writing the inactive GS base so the ordering between
> load_gs_index and wrmsrl(MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE) should be irrelevant?
load_gs_index() sets the index between a pair of swapgs's -- it writes
the inactive base, too.
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists