[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200820044347.GA4533@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:43:47 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/28] media/v4l2: remove
V4L2-FLAG-MEMORY-NON-CONSISTENT
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 03:57:53PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > Could you explain what makes you think it's unused? It's a feature of
> > > the UAPI generally supported by the videobuf2 framework and relied on
> > > by Chromium OS to get any kind of reasonable performance when
> > > accessing V4L2 buffers in the userspace.
> >
> > Because it doesn't do anything except on PARISC and non-coherent MIPS,
> > so by definition it isn't used by any of these media drivers.
>
> It's still an UAPI feature, so we can't simply remove the flag, it
> must stay there as a no-op, until the problem is resolved.
Ok, I'll switch to just ignoring it for the next version.
> Also, it of course might be disputable as an out-of-tree usage, but
> selecting CONFIG_DMA_NONCOHERENT_CACHE_SYNC makes the flag actually do
> something on other platforms, including ARM64.
It isn't just disputable, but by kernel policies simply is not relevant.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists