lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:05:16 -0500
From:   Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To:     Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: FSGSBASE causing panic on 5.9-rc1



On 8/20/20 2:04 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 8/20/20 1:41 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> On 8/20/20 1:39 PM, Jim Mattson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:38 AM Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:34 AM Tom Lendacky 
>>>> <thomas.lendacky@....com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bisecting with unsafe_fsgsbase identified:
>>>>>
>>>>> c82965f9e530 ("x86/entry/64: Handle FSGSBASE enabled paranoid 
>>>>> entry/exit")
>>>>>
>>>>> But I'm thinking that could be because it starts using GET_PERCPU_BASE,
>>>>> which on Rome would use RDPID. So is SVM restoring TSC_AUX_MSR too late?
>>>>> That would explain why I don't see the issue on Naples, which doesn't
>>>>> support RDPID.
>>>>
>>>> It looks to me like SVM loads the guest TSC_AUX from vcpu_load to
>>>> vcpu_put, with this comment:
>>>>
>>>> /* This assumes that the kernel never uses MSR_TSC_AUX */
>>>> if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP))
>>>>          wrmsrl(MSR_TSC_AUX, svm->tsc_aux);
>>>
>>> Correction: It never restores TSC_AUX, AFAICT.
>>
>> It does, it's in the host_save_user_msrs array.
> 
> I added a quick hack to save TSC_AUX to a new variable in the SVM struct 
> and then restore it right after VMEXIT (just after where GS is restored in 
> svm_vcpu_enter_exit()) and my guest is no longer crashing.

Sorry, I mean my host is no longer crashing.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tom
>>
>>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists