linux-kernel - Re: mm/gup.c:1922:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘is_valid_gup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200820135515.c36b35449143c723f0800f5b@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:55:15 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linuxarm@...wei.com, Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: mm/gup.c:1922:7: error: implicit declaration of function
 ‘is_valid_gup_flags’

On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:59:52 +0530 Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:

> arm and riscv architecture build failed on linux next 20200820 tag.
> 
> make -sk KBUILD_BUILD_USER=TuxBuild -C/linux -j16 ARCH=arm
> CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- HOSTCC=gcc CC="sccache
> arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc" O=build zImage
> 
> 348#
> 349../mm/gup.c: In function ‘get_user_pages’:
> 350../mm/gup.c:1922:7: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘is_valid_gup_flags’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 351 1922 | if (!is_valid_gup_flags(gup_flags))
> 352 | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 353cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 

Yes, thanks.

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: mm-gup-dont-permit-users-to-call-get_user_pages-with-foll_longterm-fix

fix CONFIG_MMU=n build

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYuNS3k0DVT62twfV746pfNhCSrk5sVMcOcQ1PGGnEseyw@mail.gmail.com
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/gup.c |   38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/gup.c~mm-gup-dont-permit-users-to-call-get_user_pages-with-foll_longterm-fix
+++ a/mm/gup.c
@@ -1759,6 +1759,25 @@ static __always_inline long __gup_longte
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_FS_DAX || CONFIG_CMA */
 
+static bool is_valid_gup_flags(unsigned int gup_flags)
+{
+	/*
+	 * FOLL_PIN must only be set internally by the pin_user_pages*() APIs,
+	 * never directly by the caller, so enforce that with an assertion:
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(gup_flags & FOLL_PIN))
+		return false;
+	/*
+	 * FOLL_PIN is a prerequisite to FOLL_LONGTERM. Another way of saying
+	 * that is, FOLL_LONGTERM is a specific case, more restrictive case of
+	 * FOLL_PIN.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(gup_flags & FOLL_LONGTERM))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
 static long __get_user_pages_remote(struct mm_struct *mm,
 				    unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
@@ -1789,25 +1808,6 @@ static long __get_user_pages_remote(stru
 				       gup_flags | FOLL_TOUCH | FOLL_REMOTE);
 }
 
-static bool is_valid_gup_flags(unsigned int gup_flags)
-{
-	/*
-	 * FOLL_PIN must only be set internally by the pin_user_pages*() APIs,
-	 * never directly by the caller, so enforce that with an assertion:
-	 */
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(gup_flags & FOLL_PIN))
-		return false;
-	/*
-	 * FOLL_PIN is a prerequisite to FOLL_LONGTERM. Another way of saying
-	 * that is, FOLL_LONGTERM is a specific case, more restrictive case of
-	 * FOLL_PIN.
-	 */
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(gup_flags & FOLL_LONGTERM))
-		return false;
-
-	return true;
-}
-
 /**
  * get_user_pages_remote() - pin user pages in memory
  * @mm:		mm_struct of target mm
_