[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202008201420.D9F0CB3E@keescook>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:21:45 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate: Avoid possible unnecessary
ptrace_may_access() call in kernel_move_pages()
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 02:18:21AM +0000, linmiaohe wrote:
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 07:59:33AM -0400, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> >> There is no need to check if this process has the right to modify the
> >> specified process when they are same.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hongxiang Lou <louhongxiang@...wei.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> >
> >NAK, please don't do this -- the ptrace and security hooks already do these kinds of self-introspection checks, and I'd like to keep a central place to perform these kinds of checks.
> >
>
> Many thanks for your reply.
> We also avoid get_task_struct/ put_task_struct pair of atomic ops, rcu_lock, task_lock and so on this way.
>
> >Is there a specific problem you've encountered that this fixes?
> >
>
> I'am sorry but there's no specific problem. I do this mainly to skip the unnecessary ptrace and security hooks.
Cool. Let's keep this as-is so we continue to have centralized
instrumentation of these things in the LSM. :)
Thanks for your attention to performance!
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists